click to enlargeThis was in 2007 -- do you think the map has shifted at all since then? I am guessing that the Rays area has expanded and the Mets area has shrunk. In fact, I was skeptical that the Mets owned New York City even when the map was first created. Long Island and North Jersey sure, maybe, could be Mets - but definitely not Brooklyn and the Bronx.
There are a couple other interesting things on the map already (the Nationals, really?) but I'd be curious to know what stood out to you.
3 comments:
Montana sucks.
The map was and still is erroneous as to the eastern limits (Duchess County and above) for the Yankees. A lot of this territory (East of the Hudson or at least of the Taconic)is Red Sox territory, including the strip from the Berkshires to Albany. North of the Thruway (to about Utica) is RS or half-RS turf up to the Canadian border. Red Sox games have been regularly broadcast (Channel 38 and others) in these areas since the mid-seventies.
I'm protesting Long Island and New Jersey as Mets territories... I think it is really just Queens.
Post a Comment